Are you planning to write a Wikipedia article about yourself? Are you planning to pay for someone to write an article on your behalf? Before you proceed, please take some time to thoroughly understand the principles and policies of Wikipedia, especially one of its most important policies, the neutral point of view NPOV policy.
Wikipedia seeks neutrality. An article about you written by anyone must be editorially neutral.Cheap expository essay writers website usa
It will not take sides and will report both the good and the bad about you from verifiable and reliable sources. It will not promote you. It will just contain factual information about you from independent, reliable sources. Some accomplishment or event, good or bad, may give you notability enough to qualify for a Wikipedia article. Once you have become a celebrity, your personal life may be exposed. No one is perfect, so your faults may get reported, and overreported, and reported enough to end up on Wikipedia.
Even if you have lived a life free of scandal, and your Wikipedia article is spotless, at some time in the future your first publicized mistake may well end up getting into that article. Suddenly your fame may turn into highly publicized infamy. Yes, Wikipedia is highly publicized!Cheap cheap essay proofreading service for university
It is mirrored and copied all over the place. Some reporters use Wikipedia as a source for their articles, so information about the mistakes you have made which end up in the Wikipedia article about you and which are covered in independent reliable published sources may be repeated. An article about yourself is nothing to be proud of. The neutral point of view NPOV policy will ensure that both the good and the bad about you will be told, that whitewashing is not allowed, and that the conflict of interest COI guideline limits your ability to edit out any negative material from an article about yourself.
There are serious consequences of ignoring these, and the " Law of Unintended Consequences " works on Wikipedia. Once it's in Wikipedia, it is viewed by the world and cannot be recalled.Last Updated: December 15, References Tested. This article was co-authored by our trained team of editors and researchers who validated it for accuracy and comprehensiveness. There are 25 references cited in this article, which can be found at the bottom of the page.
The wikiHow Tech Team also followed the article's instructions and verified that they work. This article has been viewedtimes. Learn more This wikihow will teach you how to write and publish an article on Wikipedia. Anyone can create a Wikipedia page, but it's important to follow their writing guidelines and choose topics that fit their standards. Your topic should be "notable" it should be a subject covered elsewhere in reasonable detailand your article should be verifiable with authoritative sources.
Once you've decided what you want to write, we've got you covered! The steps below will walk you through the whole process.How to Create Wikipedia Page for Company
How to Create a Wikipedia Article
Then, read and click through each of the first 3 pages in the Wizard to get to the Create article draft page. Click Next to go to the next page. The third page of the Article Wizard details a few of the most common mistakes that Wikipedia contributors make.
Enter the name of your article draft and click Create new article draft. This will direct you to the article draft creation page.Getting a Wikipedia page approved for your music project can be tricky.
It can also be great for building credibility and gaining exposure for your music. Because of the sheer number of relatively unknown independent artists out there, Wikipedia has become very strict in its guidelines for accepting artist pages. But, if you follow the tips below and pay close attention to Wikipedia posting guidelines, you definitely have a fighting chance.
On the other hand, If you are an established musician that has had some notable press, you may very well be able to score your own Wikipedia page. Here are some basic guidelines and tips for getting a musician page approved on Wikipedia.Essay export cotton to japan
Be Balanced. Wikipedia is a reference text. Be Notable. Wikipedia is very big on this. Has your band ever done anything notable? What do your critics say? This is one of the first things that will get your article axed. Wikipedia wants unbiased articles. That means if you or your bass player or your manager or record label guy writes the article, it will probably get deleted. Instead, Ask your friends and fans if they contribute to Wikipedia. Be thorough.
Make sure that whoever pens your entry has all the details they need. Include dates, members, lineup changes, awards, a discography, etc. What would still be of interest? Include references. Find everything and anything that references your band online. Make sure you use these references in your article.
References: How to get your band on Wikipedia. Have you tried submitting to Wikipedia? What was your experience? Do you have any tips? Let us know in the comments below. June 14, Join the Conversation.Many emails come my way daily from people asking if you can write about yourself on Wikipedia. This question is a little more complicated than the Wikipedia community would like you to think.
There are guidelines that state if you have a conflict of interest that you are strongly discouraged from editing about the topic. I want to take a few minutes to tell you that you actually can, but that I also strongly advise against it. Here are the reasons why. What it would look like if there were a college course on Wikipedia conflict of interest guidelines. I use it as often as the Wikipedia community and it is something that helps keep Wikipedia from becoming a website for public relations professionals to promote their clients in a way that is more favorable to their client than the references would support.
While there are many situations that would create a conflict of interest, one such situation is if you want to write about yourself on Wikipedia. Simply put, writing about yourself makes it difficult, but no impossible, to stay neutral. There is nothing in the guidelines that I have found that prohibits you from editing if you want to write about yourself on Wikipedia. Writing about yourself is difficult. For whatever reason you want to cite for you being able to write about yourself without difficulty, there are dozens more reasons why you cannot.
This is true for the most part that people find it difficult to write about themselves. There is nothing wrong with it, just a fact of life. Editors presume that since you wrote it, there is nothing within the article that is neutral. So, without so much as checking the references, you will see the article gutted to a few short sentences, or even recommended for deletion. While I cannot give you advice on what you should do, there are a few ways that can get your article published without the need to write about yourself on Wikipedia.
The first is one that Wikipedia assumes and I actually somewhat agree. If you are notable enough to have a Wikipedia article meaning that there are plenty of reliable sources that talk about youthen it is likely that someone will write an article about you on Wikipedia. There is no telling how long this will take or if it will even happen, but there is some weight behind that statement.
Another thing that you can do is hire a professional Wikipedia editor. This way you have someone who can use the available sources and create an article for you that meets neutrality guidelines notice I said hire a professional editor, not just a paid editor or a paid advocacy editor who will simply write anything to make you look like a superhero.
The last option, and the one that this article is about, is to ask that your article be created. This option, often as slow as the first, is to request that a Wikipedia editor write an article about you. Simply add your name to the list of requested articles and you will be among the thousands of others who are waiting patiently for someone to see their name on the list and an editor to write the article.
Follow the link in the previous paragraph and you will be taken to the main page where you can request that your article be created.Wikipedia editors should write a new article before they create links to that article in list pages, disambiguation pages, or templates in the encyclopedia.
Frequently, editors mostly inexperienced ones add wikilinked entries in lists"See also" sectionsnavigation templatesand disambiguation pages. If such an entry links to an article that does not exist, the result is a red link like this one.
When the editor goes on to create the new article, the red link in the list turns blue, and assuming the article follows Wikipedia's practices such as notabilityverifiabilityand other relevant policies and guidelineseverything is fine. Creating red links in purely navigational features of Wikipedia, like navigation templates, disambiguation pages, and "see also" sections, directly interferes with the actual function of these features, which is to help readers navigate the already existing Wikipedia resources relevant to the topic.
Red links are strongly discouraged in navigation templates and disambiguation pages, and they are never used in "See also" sections. The principal rationale for adding a red link to a disambiguation page is that the entry added is definitely notable, will probably have an article eventually, is not covered by any extant article as a subtopic or section that can be linked to, and yet is something that a non-trivial number of readers may actually be looking for at the name being disambiguated.
As Wikipedia's coverage expands, these criteria are less and less frequently met by would-be red links that editors consider adding. Lack of notability is the most common point of failure, and many such entries are deleted as essentially promotional in nature, often having been added by someone with an apparent conflict of interest.
Wikipedia probably does not need a disambiguation entry for your band's new album title, or a vice president at the company you work for, and if either the band or the company already have an article, a disambiguation entry that blue-links to that article is better than a red link that goes nowhere.
Adding red links to navigation templates is tolerated when the missing article s are part of a set or series, and the template mostly consists of blue links to real articles or article sections.
Other red-linked additions to nav templates are generally a bad idea. So is adding a red link to a non-navigation template; templates are intended to provide functionality, so if your template's functionality is broken, it is not ready for use in the encyclopedia's content.
While lists especially stand-alone list articles can serve a navigational functionlists are primarily a form of encyclopedic content. Thus, an entry often may simply present encyclopedically relevant facts from the cited reliable sources and not link to a separate article on the narrow subtopic which by itself might be encyclopedically relevant but fall short of independent notability of that particular list entry. One of the main distinctions between lists and article categories in that lists may contain non-notable entries although many lists' inclusion criteria are not so broad.
Consensus on how helpful or pointless red links in lists are has been a moving target on Wikipedia for a long time, but including them has a large number of detractors. Red-linking within lists is only helpful to editors, not readers, and is only useful when the red-linked topic is certainly notable and should have its own article; there is no point whatsoever in red-linking to relevant but non-notable subjects, since their non-notability precludes them having their own articles and thus ever having blue links.
Also, the continual addition of unsourced entries of questionable encyclopedic value — " list-cruft " which can lead to the creation of " laundry lists " — is a continual cleanup problem. In the early days of the project, before the notability guideline even existed, a "red-link with impunity" approach was an important part of jump-starting the encyclopedia project. Long "Lists of topics" also called "Index lists"sometimes with all red links, were among the first articles created.
Now, however, with the English-language Wikipedia at 6, articles, list articles with many red links play almost no role in leading to the creation of new articles.
Instead of using stand-alone "Lists of topics" articles as guides for the creation of new articles, editors have largely moved this function to wikiproject pages that cover specific areas of interest. As a result of the early Wikipedian approach, editors who these days add red links to lists often have no intention of ever themselves writing the red-linked articles.
This may be simply because writing an article is much more time-consuming than adding the link to the list or template.
Or the editor may be choosing to contribute anonymously, which means they cannot directly create an article, having to use the Wikipedia:Articles for creation process instead, and wait for their draft to be assessed.
Lastly, it may be because the editor knows, maybe even from first-hand experience, that newly created articles that do not follow Wikipedia policies and guidelines can be deleted, whether or not the editor is aware of Wikipedia's new pages patrol or is familiar with the details of the speedy deletion process or other deletion processes.
It is this last reason that is the most problematic: " List of In many cases nearly half of the edits are limited to adding spam and red links to the list.Companies and individuals are beginning to see the benefits of having a Wikipedia page, so how should you go about creating or editing a page? We regularly come across companies that have attempted it themselves, often having to pay more than they would have initially for someone to pick up the pieces later on.
This is a common approach by many looking to create a Wikipedia page about a given subject. It is much easier just to go ahead and hire a Wikipedia writer and often more cost effective.
There are a number of benefits if you hire a Wikipedia writer or editor. A number of agencies such as ourselves that offer services where you can hire a Wikipedia writer, will often look at the potential of an article before taking any work on. By hiring a Wikipedia writer, you will receive a full evaluation of the risks before any work begins.
More often than not, an article can be turned around in a couple of days, and also be written to an excellent standard. The next benefit is when problems arise. New articles are normally studied carefully by expert editors. Should the article be poorly written or badly referenced, it can mean the article encountering problems, which takes up more of your time. If an article is deleted about a subject page it greatly effects its chances the second time it is uploaded.
Therefore hiring a paid editor from the outset is a much more sensible move if you want a credible article on Wikipedia. As a summary, if you hire a Wikipedia editor your risk is lowered dramatically. Wikipedia writing agencies will have dealt with the majority of problems than can occur, and have an excellent knowledge of how to deal with common Wikipedia issues. If you are new to Wikipedia, we strongly suggest you use the link below to receive a quote for our services.
It is the hassle free way to ensure your Wikipedia article is in the best hands. Read more below.
Hiring Wikipedia Writers. Why Hire a Wikipedia Editor? Internally Create the Article This is a common approach by many looking to create a Wikipedia page about a given subject. What are the Benefits? Hire a Wikipedia Writer.Christina Katz offers a six-step process for writing a good explainer.
Do you know how to prepare an exquisite turkey dinner on a shoestring? Execute a perfect rugby tackle? Pay rock-bottom rates for accommodations in exotic destinations all over the world? How-tos inform the reader and can often be submitted to an editor with a simple cover letter. A how-to is written as a sequence—first you do this, and then you do this.
Write a How-to Article in 6 Easy Steps
Before you know it, you will have sketched out a draft of a how-to article. Choose a topic that interests you enough to focus on it for at least a week or two. If your topic is broad, narrow it. Instead of writing about how to decorate your home, try covering how to decorate your home in country style on a shoestring budget.
Then write a rough, rough draft, including everything you can think of. Stay loose, avoid getting analytical, and enjoy the process of sharing what you know. Then put it aside for a while. Now, come back to your piece. Pick three words to describe the audience you want to address e. As this reader, what questions would you like answered? Collect everything you have gathered and put it in a folder, an electronic document, a notebook or whatever you like.
You may want to sift through your research at a separate sitting from gathering it. Or just go ahead and sprinkle your research in right when you find it. Or you may just want to revise what you have as you proceed, retaining a nice conversational tone by directly addressing your audience.Speechless lady gaga song full name
This time when you read your draft, ask yourself: Is it working? Is it too general, too lightweight, uninteresting, unclear or choppy? If so, comb some of your favorite publications for how-to articles. What techniques are those writers using that you might employ? How-to articles have to be thorough.
You want your reader to walk away knowing exactly how to make that Thanksgiving dinner on a shoestring budget, execute that rugby tackle, or locate great accommodations.
- What do latter means meaning
- Stock quote sonic automotive services
- Courseworks it look good friday lyrics
- Abstract dissertation in mathematics degree engineering
- Literature terms conflict summary answers book
- Business plan consultants austin
- How to write a trance song
- Summary of an essay on criticism part
- Marketing manager recruitment job description manager
- Predatory journals researchgate research institute jobs
- Ares quote stock exchange rate
- Digital marketing funnel diagram chart
- Cool presentation backgrounds flowers background designs
- Presentations powerpoint benefits for students email
- Rite of commissioning special ministers of the eucharist
- How to write a vacation postcard
- Marketing management philosophy orientation business plan software